Karan,+Maddie

2AC order should be case, counter advocacies, disads Perm the CP, make solvency deficit arguments (why the CP doesn't solve your aff) Make sure you respond to the negatives arguments on your case AND extend your impacts Try your best to reference your evidence in cross ex Great job!
 * Practice round #1 6/23/14- Ruby**

Round 2:

Maddie—You don’t need to list the specific positions you’re reading in your order. Good cx! Try to do your prep during the 2nc so that you don’t take prep for the 1nr. Good job extending 1nc case cards in the 1nr.

6/26

Start the 2NC with a DA or another off case position. Having a 2NC on case where you only read evidence should be replaced. You make good analytics at the bottom of your speech, just make more of them!

AFF: be more aware of 2AC cards Maddie: Go a little faster, do more speaking drills. 1Ar a bit messy, extend impacts. Pay attention in the 2AC Ella: 2AC had good coverage, need to extend cards and flesh them out more. Try or die args should be made Flesh out Zeller more and why warming is the most important impact. In crossex bring in impacts, point out analytics as lacking warrants, extend dropped advantages and frame them as conceded, kick pov, compare ev Jordan: more clash, it’s more persuasive, 1NR should have been T too Arya: Keep revising blocks, add DA turns If a bottleneck occurs means that we don’t get credit for the aff, and explain why it turns poverty—the mining in china is similar to the impact that Gilligan references. 2NR was fine, don’t need to give such a basic o/v. story should come together through clash and drops. Organization would be a better if it was framed as DA turns case explicitly. Extend ev by name. Raises standard. Should have run Nuke DA and T for time skew
 * Round 6- Maddie/Ella vs Jordan/Arya**
 * Judge: Ozzy**

RFD: This debate had a lot of missed opportunities. When the 2AC drops both of your disads and only reads one card on the cap K, the neg strat should have changed to adjuct for what happened. The 2NC should have taken one DA and case, and the 1NR should have spent 5 minutes on the other DA. Instead what happened is that the 2NC extended both the disads and case, which did not allow time for much indepth analysis. The 1NR gave a very good explaination of cap and why each of the advantages link, as well as why cap is the root cause of their impacts. However, there was no explination of the alt, and you didn't respond to the sustainability debate. This allowed the 1AR to spend a lot of time on sustainability, and wins that their impacts happen before cap could ever collapse. It was a close debate that could have gon either way, but the lack of 2NR cap analysis and the 2AR's extention on cap sustainable means I vote aff. Great debate!
 * Tournament Round 2- Ruby**