Norgard,+Maddy

Good job controlling cross-ex and using it to poke holes in the affirmative's arguments Thanks for flowing the arguments on the right flow even though the aff sign posted incorrectly- it helped clean up my flow a bit Good job pointing out dropped arguments first, the only thing I will say is you could have made a bigger deal out of it. Instead of saying they have no impacts left to weigh, talk more about your impacts and why they still outweigh even if I were to evaluate their impacts Great job!
 * Practice round #1 6/23/14- Ruby**

__**Round #4: Aff (2A) v. Izzie**__
 * Case--given your speed advantage, you can make more extensive impact comparisons v. the DAs in the 2AC--not only should the impact be important, but it should be MORE important ||
 * Solid 2AC--did well in addressing the case args ||
 * Some of your tags (nuke power DA) were a bit too long--no more than you want your judge to flow ||
 * Practice how you would debate--use all your CX time :) ||
 * Good communication with partner during 1AR prep ||
 * Solid explanation of why SV impacts come first--do more with this ||
 * Pick an impact in the 2AR--tension in your impact calc… this is especially important when you are more time pressed ||