Rossini,+Sophia

Round #1 Judge: Juan Garcia

Round 2- Ruby Not enough work on poverty in the 2AC. You should spend at least 30 seconds on your impact and explaining why it outweighs all of the disads. They dropped the flow so any analysis on why that wins you the round is good. If the neg reads climate change both ways, explain why that helps you and hurts him, don’t just say it happened in the round I would have liked to see the "wind doesn’t replace fossil fuels for transportation" debate fleshed out a little more on the climate change flow "Perm do the plan and the CP in all other instances" is usually wording for the perm on a K alt. For this CP, phrase it as "Perm do the plan and ban all other subsidies" or something. Great job!

6/27 Sophia—good explanation on the tech card postdate. An overview at the top of the disad would be useful. 2ar: you do a good job of extending your 2ac T answers—be sure that you’re also answering their arguments explicitly.