Galle,+Jack

Jack Galle - 1AC - Difficult to understand at times, work on becoming clearer. Do speed drills more often, also work on enunciation drills. 1AR - work on efficiency in order to increase number of arguments you can make and answer. Extend the solvency deficit Sebastion makes in the 2AC. It is the only thing you can hedge against your opponents. Try to keep an even pace throughout the speech. Sebastion Cross - 2AC - Work on increasing the number of arguments you can make against the CP. The only actual arg you had on that flow was the solvency deficit. Expand on it. The CP and DA are closely tied, they need both to win, take them both out. Spent waaaaayyyy too much time on the inherency debate. 2AR - Give me a way to frame the impacts and how your impacts weigh against the negative. Compare and contrast yo, compare and contrast. Explain why your impacts happen sooner, are bigger, or are more likely to happen, and why I should compare them. Jay Rolfzen - 1NC - work on speed drills, increase clarity and continue with smooth flow throughout the speech. Try and build some sort of rhythm in order to keep you going. 1NR - Split the block with your partner more effectively. You should work on learning to prep more effectively. It seemed like your partner was helping you pinpoint the arguments you needed to pay attention to, but you should learn to highlight these important aspects of the debate on your flow and
 * __Round 1: Judge - Yassin Ahmed__**

Andrew Nehlick - 2NC - split the block better, take CP and DA. They're packaged together as a CP and net benefit, without the net benefit there's no reason to prefer the CP. This means as long as there is a chance the aff solves better I vote affirmative. Don't spend so much time on inherency, it's not a very good argument, nor was it well explained enough to really win you the round.

2NR - Good choice to drop the inherency arg and other unnecessary arguments, but try to limit amount of time spent "kicking" those args. Find arguments that are crucial to the aff and attack those. In this round, those arguments were the solvency deficit and the aff impx. The DA is the only thing keeping the neg afloat at the end of the debate. email me specific questions at ahmed.yassin.56@gmail.com

Round 5 (L.Smith Need to be clearer Label contentions in 1AC

Round ? (L.Smith) Be more aggressive in cross-x, you have good questions but your delivery is hesitant. Way to much prep for the 2NC. clarity still needs to improve. Vary your volume and pace. Extend 1NC cards don't just dump new cards