Lecher,+Noah

Flow the 1NC! It sounds silly when you ask if they dropped an adv in the 1NC. Avoid starting 2AC with 'okay'. Spread your T answers! Start your 2AC case flows with an overview. Why is it necessary to read cards on case in the 2AC? "They didn't put a single card on this flow. They dropped this adv" can be more efficient by saying "They conceded manufacturing"
 * 6/25**

"That causes terrorism and nuclear war" in reference to econ decline - that needs a warrant

2AC CP block - read perm and some analytically args first! Same with DA block. Start with impact analysis or comparison.

Econ shocks would had access to your econ decline impact

"manufactoring solves impact" --> explain internal link

2AR needs framing. Narrow down to one impact and do impact comparison.


 * __Practice Round 5, 6/27__**

2AC: Nice order, with T then case the offcase. Good volume, you have a very clear and commanding voice easy to flow. You are doing good analysis on climate change but try not to do under views of the cards you are reading, this is just a little redundant. Nice impact calculous. Good diversity in the arguments you are reading on your blocks. I think you spend a little too long on case overall. God speed as you get warmed up in spreading. Good answers on the capitalism kritik, nice work doing line-by-line analytics and reading cards when necessary.

CX: Good answers, you could be a little more assertive. Good smart questions, nice ethos.

2AR: Good impact overview on your case, going to one big impact and using that as your analysis point is smart. I don't know if going the human right is the best route, supporting capitalism definitely is not the most concerned with human rights. Don't rely on them not having cards on the flow for it to mean they haven't answered your flow, cap turns this advantage. Pretty sure he extended perm do both, not perm all other instances, also the Gibson-Graham evidence I think actually supports more the alt than the perm. Ultimately all really good answers on cap just don't underestimate the flexibility and crossapplicability of cap. Overall good work, very impressed that you are just going to be a sophomore!


 * Round 6: Blaize DePass:** Aasim/Nisarg vs Noah/Sam

Noah (1NC)--I like the 1NC, you have good time allocation, leaving lots of time for case. I think you might want to speak about the top of the 1AC in some way shape or form, but at least speak on it. I think you want to work on speaking a little bit. Your speed is good, but you want to make sure you still have clarity throughout and become more seamless.

Noah (1NR)--This 1NR needed some work. During the 2NC you should be prepping the 1NR, you don't have to flow his speech. On top of that i think that you just want to practice doing some more analysis. You're almost there, but you want to explain what the evidence says. Also, have a little more confidence in yourself. If you are more confident that will signal to that judge that you aren't giving up. Making sure that you are confident is important because this can actually win you debates in a lot of instances.

RFD: This debate had a lot of structural problems out of the 1NC. The neg reads 2AC perm cards on cap in the 1NC, which allows the aff to just extend those cards as offense and reasons why their aff solves cap. Also reading the cap K doesn't really work with the oil drilling good DA that has an impact of econ collapse bad. I give the aff that the perm solves best on the cap K and that the aff solves their impacts.
 * MDAW Tournament Round 1- Ruby**