Harker,+Eleanor

Face me during cross ex Good responses to cross ex Good 1AR order and time management Work on evidence comparison, especially during the 1AR Great job!
 * Practice round #1 6/23/14- Ruby**

Round 2: Ella—good cx. Don’t include your overview and analytics in the speech doc you flash to them. You have the right instinct in contesting the perm—it would be better to address it as a solvency defecit than as an impossibility. 2nr: If you start with the cp, you should stay there rather than going elsewhere and then coming back. Be sure that you talk about the ways that your disad and cp interact with the aff.

6/26 Great 1NR! You made good analytics. Try to speed up and avoid repeating yourself to increase the amount of args you can make.

AFF: be more aware of 2AC cards Maddie: Go a little faster, do more speaking drills. 1Ar a bit messy, extend impacts. Pay attention in the 2AC Ella: 2AC had good coverage, need to extend cards and flesh them out more. Try or die args should be made Flesh out Zeller more and why warming is the most important impact. In crossex bring in impacts, point out analytics as lacking warrants, extend dropped advantages and frame them as conceded, kick pov, compare ev Jordan: more clash, it’s more persuasive, 1NR should have been T too Arya: Keep revising blocks, add DA turns If a bottleneck occurs means that we don’t get credit for the aff, and explain why it turns poverty—the mining in china is similar to the impact that Gilligan references. 2NR was fine, don’t need to give such a basic o/v. story should come together through clash and drops. Organization would be a better if it was framed as DA turns case explicitly. Extend ev by name. Raises standard. Should have run Nuke DA and T for time skew
 * Round 6- Maddie/Ella vs Jordan/Arya**
 * Judge: Ozzy**

RFD: This debate had a lot of missed opportunities. When the 2AC drops both of your disads and only reads one card on the cap K, the neg strat should have changed to adjuct for what happened. The 2NC should have taken one DA and case, and the 1NR should have spent 5 minutes on the other DA. Instead what happened is that the 2NC extended both the disads and case, which did not allow time for much indepth analysis. The 1NR gave a very good explaination of cap and why each of the advantages link, as well as why cap is the root cause of their impacts. However, there was no explination of the alt, and you didn't respond to the sustainability debate. This allowed the 1AR to spend a lot of time on sustainability, and wins that their impacts happen before cap could ever collapse. It was a close debate that could have gon either way, but the lack of 2NR cap analysis and the 2AR's extention on cap sustainable means I vote aff. Great debate!
 * Tournament Round 2- Ruby**