Reinhardt,+Daniel

Round #1 Judge: Raymond Zhang
 * please give your 1 a chance to answer ||
 * Nice persuasive sound\ ||
 * Realize what the 1 n read ||
 * Very good 2AC ||
 * You should explain how you get to extinction, and how impact scenerios work. You did a really good 2NR ||


 * 6/26**

¬¬¬¬¬2NC

For your roadmap, you only have to say which flows you’re going to You should talk to us in lab about how to paperless

2nr

Start with some form of overview, a reason why youre winning the round. In this debate, you should focus on the poverty arguments, and why you’re accepting their impact analysis that it outweighs, but that capitalism is the best internal link into poverty. You should try and argue why your critcisim might access the root cause or the real reason why their impacts happen in the first place (for example, the reason there is warming is because of capitalisms drive to find new markets and ignore the destructive effects on the evnrionment) You’re doing a good job with the base for some of these arguments in the context of the poverty flow but I think you could do more to organize these arguments into an overview or a “here’s why we win the round moment”. How you do that frames the debate for the judge.

You also need to be sure you’re actually answering the arguments the 1Ar extended in order to win the theseis of their arguments. You should use the evidence you read in the 2NC in order to try and engage with the argumetns the 1Ar is reading You need to spend more time engaging the link debate her – you do the root cause stuff as time goes on, but you don’t explain why the Aff is a tool of capitalism, or why the Aff is tied up in capitalism in a way that means they cant solve – the link is the most important thing when you’re debating the kritik – so you want to be as specific as possible – talk about it in the context of their manufacturing advantage, or in the context of their energy poverty advantage and the question of who would actually get the cheaper energy, or whether we would decrease prices, or just continue to explit the poor You could also criticize the idea of getting additional energy by saying that it would just be used to increase consumption ,w hich proves that capitalism can never create green solutions to the environmental crisis because it is pursuing ever-increasing growth