Nelhlich,+Andrew

__**Round 1 - Judge Yassin Ahmed**__ check Jack Galle's wiki for comments on this round

Round 4: (Adriane Brown) Andrew—good presence in cx. 2nc—really great speech overall. You do a really good job of the “they said—we say” stuff. Give warrants on why a postdate matters. Make sure you extend terminal mpx on the line-by-line. I’d suggest writing out your impact calc as an overview in your disad blocks. 2nr—Good speech—I think T was a good way to go. I think using “no link” arguments on one flow to supercharge another is super strategic in general, but it doesn’t work as well in this case because they’re not making those arguments to spike out of disads. You don’t need to spell out the ways that they could have answered—just focus on the answers they did make. You have good word efficiency in this speech—work on organizing your flow so that you can work on this even more.

Round ? (L.Smith) Good 1AC. It was clear. You varied your speed and it was easy to follow. 1AR was light on evidence comparison - you rely on saying we have X number of cards as a crutch and are light on extend the warrant from our ev and comparing it to theirs.


 * Round 7: Blaize DePass:** Andrew/Clara vs Tanner/CJ

Andrew (1AC)--You got the speed, and you've got the clarity for tags. But you should practice some clarity for the text of the evidence because it's important to be able to understand the words that you are saying. This will affect your speaker points as well because someone who is more clear will get more speaker points. I can understand a lot of it, but there are definitely places where you slur your words. This can be fixed easily with some enunciation drills. I think you should fill the last 50 seconds of your speech with some more evidence, just important to fill your time.

Andrew (1AR)--This was a good speech for the most part. I think that you need to get to the off-case with more time remaining, because you want to have answers to their arguments and make sure nothing goes unanswered. I think you have good impact analysis but want to take it a step further and do a little more comparison. Also, I'm not the judge you need to watch out for, but watch swearing because that can turn a lot of judges off, just something to watch out for. Besides that good analysis and arguments.